home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1713>
- <title>
- Dec. 05, 1994: Political Interest:Issue with Jesse
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Dec. 05, 1994 50 for the Future
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST, Page 37
- Taking Issue with Jesse
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> If Jesse Helms and Bill Clinton agree on anything, it is that
- Syria can't be trusted. The President won't say so publicly.
- The incoming chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
- says it all the time. Despite their shared skepticism, Clinton
- and Helms view the future differently. In concert with Israeli
- Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Clinton is pushing an Israeli-Syrian
- peace treaty. Like Israeli opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu,
- Helms dismisses the process as a "fraud." Syria, says Netanyahu,
- wants Israelis "resting in peace, not living in peace."
- </p>
- <p> As the negotiations stretch on, the key obstacle remains Syria's
- demand that Israel return the strategic Golan Heights captured
- in the 1967 war. Critics view the price as too high, and even
- those who support a peace accord are loath to relinquish the
- Golan. Who would feel safe in the U.S. capital if just across
- the Potomac River an enemy force occupied a 9,000-ft.-high plateau
- in northern Virginia?
- </p>
- <p> Many Israelis believe Syrian President Hafez Assad has observed
- a cold peace with Jerusalem because he hopes to get his territory
- back; give up the Golan, they argue, and Syria will lose any
- incentive to stay in line. Then, says Netanyahu, "nothing would
- keep Damascus from violating a treaty."
- </p>
- <p> Other Israelis argue that with Jordan and Egypt at peace with
- Israel, Jerusalem has the security it needs. A combined Arab
- force failed to vanquish Israel in four previous wars, they
- note; if the talks with Syria collapse, Damascus is unlikely
- to wage a one-on-one battle over the Golan. "So why deal on
- Assad's terms?" asks Netanyahu.
- </p>
- <p> If an agreement with Syria is ever reached, Rabin promises a
- national referendum to ratify it. His chances will improve immeasurably
- if the U.S. agrees to station troops on the Golan to monitor
- the deal. Clinton has indicated he would send them, but political
- realities dictate that Congress approve the deployment, and
- Helms is only one of many who say no. "Just like in Beirut,
- our forces would be an inviting target for extremists out to
- derail the peace even if Syria itself really favors it," says
- New York Senator Al D'Amato, whose views on the matter are respected
- by other Senators because of his state's large Jewish population.
- </p>
- <p> Terrorism is always a possibility, but the risks pale beside
- the opportunity of a pact with Syria. Even with Israel at peace
- with its other neighbors, Syria might seek to undermine the
- existing agreements if it remains the only state on Israel's
- borders still at war with it. Peace with Syria would also calm
- the region, help secure Western access to Middle East oil at
- reasonable prices and further isolate Iraq and Iran, the bad
- actors supporting the world's worst terrorists.
- </p>
- <p> Finally, those who dismiss Syria's potential to wage war alone
- against Israel miscalculate; past conflicts are a poor forecast
- of future battles. In this case, Israeli civilians would face
- a new threat: a missile attack far harsher than the limited
- Scud barrage Iraq launched at Tel Aviv during the Gulf War.
- Syria already possesses the most advanced strategic-weapons
- capability in the Arab world, and its chemical, biological and
- ballistic missile programs are proceeding on a crash basis even
- as Damascus talks peace. A battle utilizing weapons of mass
- destruction would invariably provoke a punishing Israeli counterstrike,
- possibly with nuclear weapons, but Israel would suffer as never
- before. For that reason alone, peace with Syria is clearly in
- Israel's interest. If the cost involves stationing 1,000 U.S.
- troops in a demilitarized Golan--which is the number the parties
- are talking about--that is a small commitment for a large
- and unambiguously worthy goal.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-